Feds Nix Two Tribal Gaming Compacts, Gov. Gavin Newsom Protests

Feds Nix Two Tribal Gaming Compacts, Gov. Gavin Newsom Protests.

Costfoto / NurPhoto / Getty Images

Key Takeaways

The US Department of the Interior decided not to approve Class III gaming compacts with two California tribes — the Santa Rosa Indian Community of the Santa Rosa Rancheria and the Middletown Rancheria of Pomo Indians — claiming that they violated portions of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act.

Tachi Palace Casino ResortThe Tachi Palace Casino Resort in Lemoore, Calif, seen above. The federal government recently denied two compacts signed by the State of California, including one with the Santa Rosa Indian Community of the Santa Rosa Rancheria to expand their resort. (Image: tachipalace.com)

Both tribes were reportedly planning a “casino resort complex,” according to rejection letters sent to the tribes and the state. These plans include building new restaurants and hotels that operate beyond the gaming spaces regulated by the Tribe’s Gaming Commission.

Taking issue with several definitions in the compacts, the feds wrote, The 2022 compact confers expansive powers on the state and local governments to regulate the tribe’s activities and lands that are not directly related to the actual conduct of gaming.”

State-tribal Class III gaming compacts are agreements between the state and separate tribal governments that specify how many gaming devices and casinos a single tribe can operate, according to the Tribal Alliance of Sovereign Indian Nations.

The Santa Rosa Rancheria had planned to expand the gaming space in their Tachi Palace Casino Resort in Lemoore, Calif. by 44,000 square feet and build a 12-room hotel tower, a bingo hall/conference center, and a three-level garage.

Newsom Slams Decision

California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) strongly rebuked the feds’ decision, warning of its repercussions. He said in a statement that the disapprovals Threaten the ability of these and other tribes to invest and maintain jobs in many of California’s economically disadvantaged communities.

He noted that the compacts were “carefully negotiated by the state and the tribes in compliance with the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act” to give tribes the “economic benefits of gaming while mitigating impacts to local communities.” And he noted that this latest agreement came on top of existing compacts signed between the tribes and the state in 1999.

This is the second time the Interior Department has disapproved of compacts with the same tribes, following a similar decision in November 2021.

California has ratified gaming compacts with 75 tribes, and currently hosts 66 casinos operated by 63 tribes, according to the California Gambling Control Commission.

Article Sources
Encore Boston Harbor Pilfers Employees From MGM Springfield as Massachusetts Casino Rivalry Intensifies editorial policy.
  1. Senior UK Policitician Accused of Betting on Himself to Lose Election

Compare Accounts
×
Blackstone Gobbles Up 10 Percent of Crown Resorts, Melco Sells Stake at Big Loss
Provider
Name
Description
Alleged Circa Imposter Charged with Similar Con at Eureka Mesquite  China and 10 Southeast Asia Nations Agree to Transnational Casino Crime Crackdown  Skill-gaming Innovator GameCo Seeks Funding for Expansion  Philippine President Duterte Says Chinese Casino Loan Sharks and Kidnappers Will Be Caught ‘Dead or Alive’  Sports Bettors Want Losing Wagers to Cheating Houston Astros Refunded, One Book Obliges  Wynn Everett Construction Postponed Indefinitely as Somerville Mayor Appeals Environmental Permit  MGM Grand Stabbing Suspects Charged on Several Counts  Chicago Cubs First in MLB to Announce Sportsbook Plans, Inks Deal with DraftKings  Zynga Social Gaming Founder Mark Pincus Fights Fellow Billionaire Over San Fran Homeless Tax Issues as Midterms Loom  Better Collective To Deliver Sports Betting Data To German Sports Broadcaster